Professional Development for Educational Leaders on Integrating Technology into Classrooms by Diane H. Zack

Image by Flickr user Marco Verch

Educational leaders have a professional responsibility to provide focused professional learning to support teachers in incorporating technology into engaging classroom lessons and curricula. The following is the first part of a series designed to provide educational leaders insights on the content, structure, and strategies necessary for developing effective professional learning to support their teachers learning to integrate technology.

PART 1:  Answering “Why” Integrating Technology Into our Lessons is Imperative

Technology has expanded and redefined the way our society communicates, conducts business, innovates, collaborates, and learns. Our educational leaders must lead the way and support teachers learning to redesign classroom lessons to meet the needs of our 21st Century learners. “In a Future Ready District, curriculum, instruction, and assessment are tightly aligned, redesigned to engage students in 21st Century, personalized, technology-enabled, deeper learning.  Curricula and instruction are standards-aligned, research-based, and enriched through authentic, real-world problem-solving. Assessments are shifting to be online, embedded, and performance-based” (Office of Educational Technology [OET], 2016). It is essential that our district teachers learn to integrate technology to enhance classroom instruction, individualize students’ learning, and use data for progress monitoring (OET, 2016).

The first step in instructing teachers is to provide reasons as to “why” their lessons and curriculum must evolve to include digital technology. Acquiring teacher support, knowledge, and understanding of any educational initiative will increase the probability of successful implementation (Cohen & Hill, 2001; Guskey, 2002). For professional learning to be effective, teachers must understand “how” their students will benefit from the changes and “why” these changes are important. Lessons and curricula must evolve to include digital technology because technology can: (1) increase student motivation to learn; (2) enhance understanding of core subject areas; (3) allow for flexibility in communication and assessments; and (4) promote 21st Century skills.

Increase Motivation Technology, when learner-centered, can provide multiple forms of motivational appeal such as challenge, curiosity, control, and fantasy (Wang & Reeves, 2007). Digital tools offer opportunities to diversify classroom instruction and better align classroom activities with students’ cognitive development, abilities, interests, and creativity (Anderson, 2008; CAST, 2011; Kanwar, 2012; McCombs, 2000; Wang & Reeves, 2007). Effective use of instructional technology allows for constructive and encouraging feedback, flexibility, increased student confidence, and scaffolding to boost student engagement (Buzzetto-More, 2007; Fluckiger et al., 2010; Wang & Reeves, 2007).

Additionally, student-centered learning positively affects student motivation (Wang & Reeves, 2007). Choice empowers learners and extends their interests while influencing their educational goals (Wang & Reeves, 2007). Research by Roscoe, Derksen, and Curtis describes technology as a potential tool to “facilitate the incorporation of text, digital graphics, sound, and video into a single source to enhance understanding, address different learning styles, and engage students interest and attention” (2013, p 56). When students have an opportunity to “mingle” their technological interests with their learning opportunities, their learning becomes more authentic and child-centered (Dewey, 1902).

Enhances Learning Classroom technology may enhance student understanding of core subject areas and is supported by constructivist, behaviorist, sociocultural, and situated learning perspectives (Anderson, 2008; Downes et al., 2001). From the constructivist’s perspective, technology allows individual learners to create new knowledge by connecting their current understandings to newly presented materials (Bonk & Cunningham, 1998). Digital technology promotes learning through a meta-cognitive process of reflection, which is a self-conscious management of learning through thinking (Chang & Wu, 2012; Greeno et al., 1996; Jimoyiannis, 2010). Integration of technology allows students to construct their knowledge through scaffolding, through active engagement in the production of knowledge, reflection on their success and failures, and through the revision of their work (CAST, 2011; Tondeur, et al., 2016).

Technology used for collaboration to enrich discussion, engagement, and exchanging ideas may positively influence learning (Bonk & Cunningham, 1998; Buzetto-More, 2006). Technology used intentionally to construct learning environments that encourage social relationships, support the cultural environment, and connect prior knowledge to new contexts may increase student knowledge (Greeno et al., 1996). Collaboration enhances student learning; digital tools enable the creation of collaborative learning environments and can therefore enhance learners’ understanding of core learning objectives.

Professional learning designed to teach educators must emphasize that integrating technology into the classroom and curriculum increases student motivation and empowers students to learn.

Flexible Communication and Assessment As a communication tool, technology allows for extensive collaborative participation and adds flexibility for students to share their perceptions and ways of thinking (Beatty & Gerace, 2009; Bonk & Cunningham, 1998). Educational standards can be socially negotiated and group work, sharing of findings, and teamwork can be emphasized while learning and during assessments of content knowledge (Bonk & Cunningham, 1998; Buzzetto-More & Alade, 2006). Technology provides students the means to build consensus, cooperate, reflect, and gather their knowledge in small groups or as a community (Beatty & Gerace, 2009; Bonk & Cunningham, 1998; Buzzetto-More & Alade, 2006).

Kanwar (2012) suggests assessment should be an ongoing process that involves planning, discussion, consensus building, reflection, measuring, analyzing and improving. Integrating classroom technology provides rich and innovative tools in alignment with Kanwar’s research. Formative assessments embedded into digitized learning activities provide programmed learning paths and allow students to scaffold their knowledge, rectify misconceptions, and meet students’ cognitive readiness (Chu, 2014; Lin & Lai, 2013). Digitized summative assessments such electronic portfolios and projects may help students develop organizational skills, highlight students’ talents, demonstrate the progression of students’ academic skills, and tools for self-reflection (Buzzetto-More & Adade, 2006). Electronic portfolios designed to emphasize self-assessment, reflection, student-teacher interaction, collaboration, and evaluation may improve learning performance (Chang & Tseng, 2009; Wu, 2005).

Digital technology allows students to demonstrate their knowledge through multiple means while increasing student motivation. Technology facilitates the incorporation of text, digital graphics, sound, and video, each of which can enhance the learning to address the needs of different learning styles and engage students’ varying interests, attention spans, and cognitive abilities (Jimoyiannis, 2010; Roscoe, et al., 2013). Technology may be used to provide students with a learner-based assessment that allows students a flexible way to demonstrate their knowledge and assists in developing a classroom climate more focused on learning rather than grading (Fluckiger, Vigil, Pasco, and Danielson, 2010). Classroom technology used in conjunction with project-based assessments promote 21st Century Skills and have the potential to reform and alter the organization of both schooling and learning (Tondeur, et al., 2016).

Promotes 21st Century Skills  According to the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE), promoting 21st Century Skills requires educational leaders who are able to “implement, sustain and continually improve the use of technology to support learning” (ISTE, 2016a).  To meet the diverse learning needs of our students, educational leaders must promote teacher agency and a culture of innovation and collaboration to support educators in developing lessons that incorporate 21st Century Skills (ISTE, 2016a). These 21st Century Skills include the student’s ability to: (1) communicate effectively, by building logical arguments and using reasoning; (2) work creatively in generating knowledge and problem solving; (3) collaborate as a team and to network; (4) think critically and evaluate knowledge and knowledge claims; (5) demonstrate digital age literacy with regard to information, and communication technologies; and (6) demonstrate life skills related to leadership, ethics, accountability, and personal productivity (Anderson, 2008; ISTE, 2016b; Jacobs, 2012; OET, 2016; P21, 2016).

It is imperative for educational leaders to provide teachers with learning opportunities on integrating technology so that our students’ learning experiences will be in alignment with the Standards established by the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE, 2016a). These standards require teachers to empower learners to use technology as they take an active role in choosing, achieving and demonstrating competency in core curricular goals (ISTE, 2016b). Teachers must guide students to use technology to become knowledge constructors, innovative designers, computational thinkers, communicators, and global collaborators (ISTE, 2016b). As Jimoyiannis points out in his 2010 article, educators must act by integrating technology into their classroom and curriculum and using digital technology as a learning tool with a meaningful context to fulfill the needs of our 21st Century Learners.

Teachers Must Understand “Why”  Professional learning must be provided to teachers as to “why” 21st Century Skills necessitate the evolution of their lessons to include technology.   Understanding “why” will increase the motivation and commitment of teachers to incorporate 21st Century Skills into their lessons. Professional learning designed to teach educators must emphasize that integrating technology into the classroom and curriculum increases student motivation and empowers students to learn. Through professional learning, our educators need to learn that students who practice 21st Century Skills while engaging in a collaborative environment gain more flexibility in constructing and demonstrating their knowledge while accomplishing their learning goals.  Our educational leaders have a responsibility to support teachers redesigning their lessons and curriculum to include 21st Century Skills. Our educational leaders must providing relevant and effective professional learning and the first lesson to help our teachers should start with “why”.

References:

Anderson, R. (2008). Implications of the information and knowledge society for education. In J. Voogt, & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.

Beatty, I., & Gerace, W. (2009). Technology-enhanced formative assessment: A research-based pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology,18(2), 146-162. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23036186

Bonk, C. J., & Cunningham, D. J. (1998). Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse, 25.

Buzzetto-More, N. A. (Ed.). (2007). Advanced principles of effective e-learning. Santa Rosa, California: Informing Science Press.

Buzzetto-More, N. A., & Alade, A. J. (2006). Best practices in e-assessment. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5(1), 251-269.

CAST. (2011). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.0. Wakefield, MA: Author. http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlguidelines.

Chang, C.C., & Wu, B.H. (2012). Is teacher assessment reliable or valid for high school students under a web-based portfolio environment?. Educational Technology & Society, 15 (4), 265–278.

Chang, C.C., & Tseng, K.-H. (2009). Using a web-based portfolio assessment system to elevate project-based learning performances. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(2), 25-37.

Chu, Hui-Chun. (2014). Potential negative effects of mobile learning on students’ learning achievement and cognitive load – a format assessment perspective. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 332-344. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.1.332

Cohen, D .K., & Hill, H. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. [Google books version] http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=TTJLAAAAIAAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA40&dq=The+Child+and+the+Curriculum&ots=u6GZ0yA3r5&sig=39YYoWD4a0zNx-ayqTKDIe4Oo10.

Downes, T., Fluck, A., Gibbons, P., Leonard, R., Matthews, C., Oliver, R., Vickers, M., & Williams, M. (2001). Making better connections: Models of teacher professional development for the integration of information and communication technology into classroom practice. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

Fluckiger, J., Vigil, Y. T. Y., Pasco, R., & Danielson, K. (2010). Formative feedback: Involving students as partners in assessment to enhance learning. College Teaching, 58(4), 136-140.

Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.) Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15-46). New York: Macmillan.

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and teaching, 8(3), 381-391.

International Society for Technology in Education. (2016a). ISTE standards for education leaders. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/standards/for-education-leaders.

International Society for Technology in Education. (2016b). ISTE standards for students. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/standards/standards-for-students.

Jacobs, H.H. (2012). Curriculum 21: Essential education for a changing world. Alexandria, VA. ASCD.

Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Developing a technological pedagogical content knowledge framework for science education: Implications of a teacher trainers’ preparation program. Proceedings of the Informing Science & IT Education Conference (In SITE 2010) (pp. 597–607). Cassino, Italy.

Kanwar, S. (2012). Assessment – An important facet of learning.  Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), Special Issue, Volume 1, Issue 2, 2012

Lin, J.W. &  Lai, Y.C. (2013). Harnessing collaborative annotations on online formative assessments. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 263-274. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.16.1.263

McCombs, B. L. (2000). Assessing the role of educational technology in the teaching and learning process: A Learner-centered perspective.

Office of Educational Technology (OET). (2016). U.S. Department of Education. https://tech.ed.gov/

P21-Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved March 16, 2017, from http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework

Roscoe, K., Derksen, A., & Curtis, K. (2013). Using presentation software to integrate formative assessment into science instruction. Science Scope, 36(5), 48-57. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43184269

Tondeur, J., Forkosh-Baruch, A., Prestridge, S., Albion, P., & Edirisinghe, S. (2016). Responding to challenges in teacher professional development for ICT integration in education. Educational Technology & Society, 19 (3), 110–120.

Wang, S. K., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). The effects of a web-based learning environment on student motivation in a high school earth science course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(2), 169-192.

Diane H. Zack is currently completing a Certificate in Administration through the Pennsylvania State World Campus and recently earned an Ed.D. from the University of Delaware in Educational Leadership with concentrations in Curriculum, Technology and Higher Education.  Diane has worked for years as a public high school math teacher, curriculum writer & coordinator, and as a writer and presenter of teachers’ professional development. Diane is dedicated to providing teachers with professional development to increase students’ opportunities to learn 21st Century Skills.

8 Comments